<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Directory Submissions &#8211; Do Not Make These 4 Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timscullin.com/seo/directory-submissions-do-not-make-these-4-mistakes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timscullin.com/seo/directory-submissions-do-not-make-these-4-mistakes</link>
	<description>Social Media Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 07:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Scullin</title>
		<link>http://timscullin.com/seo/directory-submissions-do-not-make-these-4-mistakes/comment-page-1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Scullin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timscullin.com/?p=353#comment-267</guid>
		<description>To some degree, if you&#039;re not getting quality backlinks then they are of little value to the search engine. Also if it takes you a day to submit your articles to 1000 directories, is there a way of generating more traffic and better quality backlinks in the same amount of time? I would suggest you find these other approaches and implement them instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some degree, if you&#8217;re not getting quality backlinks then they are of little value to the search engine. Also if it takes you a day to submit your articles to 1000 directories, is there a way of generating more traffic and better quality backlinks in the same amount of time? I would suggest you find these other approaches and implement them instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almir</title>
		<link>http://timscullin.com/seo/directory-submissions-do-not-make-these-4-mistakes/comment-page-1#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>almir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timscullin.com/?p=353#comment-180</guid>
		<description>very interesting post it certainly makes sense. That makes a lot of sense that by submitting to the best quality sites are really the most beneficial considering the other thousands of backlinks you get from those sites wouldn&#039;t generate any traffic to your website. But isn&#039;t it also great because you would get 1000&#039;s of backlinks that makes your site appear  much more popular than only getting the 5 backlinks from the top quality directories. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting post it certainly makes sense. That makes a lot of sense that by submitting to the best quality sites are really the most beneficial considering the other thousands of backlinks you get from those sites wouldn&#039;t generate any traffic to your website. But isn&#039;t it also great because you would get 1000&#039;s of backlinks that makes your site appear  much more popular than only getting the 5 backlinks from the top quality directories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

